FraG LimiT

NaRuto · **Posted:** Tue Sep 11, 2007 12:03 am

[font=Comic Sans MS]So what u guys think.... and why??[/font]

MLady · **Joined:** Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:57 am **Posts:** 303

I voted 35 because 40 is too many!!!!

Coolest · **Posted:** Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:55 am

i vote 35 as well!

KEVLAR · **Posted:** Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:29 pm

I voted 15, Im tired of games that last 9-12 min. I mean the only thing I can think is beginners must be playing for 30-50 min before the match is over. I watch the bots fight and it takes them 25-35 min to get to 35 frags. That is to long. Back in the early 2000's when this game had a tone of players, we needed high frag limits to make the game last more then 2 min. But we are lucky if in a month we have over 4 players in at the same time. 4 players DO NOT need a 35-40 frag limit. We just dont have the player backing like the past was.

FlashCobra · **Joined:** Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:31 am **Posts:** 247

>Ok I vote 35 to.<

Coolest · **Posted:** Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:50 am

yay!! good boy flashy poo

FlashCobra · **Joined:** Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:31 am **Posts:** 247

>LOLLL Kev 15 fraggs why don't we all just line up for you can>
>shoot us all at ones :lol:

.<

>Also if you vote PLZ post why you voted.< :!:

KEVLAR · **Posted:** Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:14 am

FlashCobra wrote:

>LOLLL Kev 15 fraggs why don't we all just line up for you can>
>shoot us all at ones :lol:

.<

>Also if you vote PLZ post why you voted.< :!:

LOL thats the idea right flash... No i think 25 frags is a better choice, but i just wanted to make a statement about match times and game player numbers and how they are very associated with eacthother.

High number of players = high number or frags
low number of players = low number in frags

unfortunatly quake just does not have the player backing it used to, I mean i loved the 100 frags, but it was still a 5-6 min game.

example: most 1vs1 matches are under 15 frags.

Necromancer · **Joined:** Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:50 am **Posts:** 194

i vote as many because I JUST LOVE TO KILL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

there is no better answer for that

Samael · **Posted:** Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:09 pm

i voted 35 because 30 wasnt an option

in truth i think 35 is too much

but i also think that 20 is too low

i liked the server the way it was when i first joined i thaught it was perfect

(if i remember right it was 30 maybe it was 25 i cant be sure but i do remember that i liked it)

Samael · **Posted:** Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:41 pm

hmmm i wish i could change my vote actually to say 20

(i think it was at 35 when i started now that i have had time to contemplate it but im not sure i have been gone a long time hahaha)

zXTury · **Joined:** Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:37 pm **Posts:** 11

i voted 40.. cuz pool dont have 50 option xD

Nathan · **Posted:** Thu Jul 03, 2008 12:36 pm

I chose 35 because 30 wasn't and option, LOL. I think though if 30 was an option I would choose it because with 35 and only 3 people on a big map it tends to be a little while longer but 30 would do the trick.

Nathan

Ghost[Geezer] · **Joined:** Wed Dec 17, 2008 7:56 pm **Posts:** 2

Hey Kev, you need to watch the server more often.
There have been times when their were way more than 4.
I agree that the games are lasting a little longer but not that much.
30 IS the perfect number however, 35 takes too long.
I enjoy your guys server a lot.

FraG LimiT

Who is online